| GAME #1 | ||
| Karen Helmn | Fiona Sudding | |
|
10 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
4 |
|
| Ruth Needham | Linda Foy | |
| ----- GAME #1 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.254 | 3.048 | ||
|
win probability
13.57% of 0.100 = 0.014 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.014 | +0.006 | +0.020 |
| Losers | -0.014 | +0.004 | -0.010 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Helmn | 3.064 | +0.020 | 3.084 |
| Fiona Sudding | 3.443 | +0.020 | 3.463 |
| Ruth Needham | 3.000 | -0.010 | 2.990 |
| Linda Foy | 3.095 | -0.010 | 3.085 |
| GAME #2 | ||
| Karen Helmn | Linda Foy | |
|
13 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
8 |
|
| Fiona Sudding | Ruth Needham | |
| ----- GAME #2 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.085 | 3.227 | ||
|
win probability
78.18% of 0.100 = 0.078 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.078 | +0.005 | +0.083 |
| Losers | -0.078 | +0.008 | -0.070 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Helmn | 3.084 | +0.083 | 3.167 |
| Linda Foy | 3.085 | +0.083 | 3.168 |
| Fiona Sudding | 3.463 | -0.070 | 3.393 |
| Ruth Needham | 2.990 | -0.070 | 2.920 |
| GAME #3 | ||
| Zak Golombeck | Fiona Sudding | |
|
13 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
10 |
|
| Gary Daley | Ruth Needham | |
| ----- GAME #3 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.370 | 2.982 | ||
|
win probability
2.98% of 0.100 = 0.003 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.003 | +0.003 | +0.006 |
| Losers | -0.003 | +0.010 | +0.007 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zak Golombeck | 3.346 | +0.006 | 3.352 |
| Fiona Sudding | 3.393 | +0.006 | 3.399 |
| Gary Daley | 3.044 | +0.007 | 3.051 |
| Ruth Needham | 2.920 | +0.007 | 2.927 |
| GAME #4 | ||
| Fiona Sudding | Linda Foy | |
|
13 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
4 |
|
| Karen Helmn | Ruth Needham | |
| ----- GAME #4 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.321 | 3.015 | ||
|
win probability
6.01% of 0.100 = 0.006 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.006 | +0.009 | +0.015 |
| Losers | -0.006 | +0.004 | -0.002 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiona Sudding | 3.399 | +0.015 | 3.414 |
| Linda Foy | 3.243 | +0.015 | 3.258 |
| Karen Helmn | 3.103 | -0.002 | 3.101 |
| Ruth Needham | 2.927 | -0.002 | 2.925 |
| GAME #5 | ||
| Zak Golombeck | Ruth Needham | |
|
12 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
6 |
|
| Gopal | Linda Foy | |
| ----- GAME #5 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.155 | 3.093 | ||
|
win probability
36.52% of 0.100 = 0.037 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.037 | +0.006 | +0.043 |
| Losers | -0.037 | +0.006 | -0.031 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zak Golombeck | 3.384 | +0.043 | 3.427 |
| Ruth Needham | 2.925 | +0.043 | 2.968 |
| Gopal | 2.928 | -0.031 | 2.897 |
| Linda Foy | 3.258 | -0.031 | 3.227 |
| GAME #6 | ||
| Linda Foy | Ruth Needham | |
|
13 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
9 |
|
| Fiona Sudding | Karen Helmn | |
| ----- GAME #6 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.098 | 3.269 | ||
|
win probability
82.37% of 0.100 = 0.082 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.082 | +0.004 | +0.086 |
| Losers | -0.082 | +0.009 | -0.073 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Foy | 3.227 | +0.086 | 3.313 |
| Ruth Needham | 2.968 | +0.086 | 3.054 |
| Fiona Sudding | 3.434 | -0.073 | 3.361 |
| Karen Helmn | 3.104 | -0.073 | 3.031 |