| GAME #1 | ||
| Zak Golombeck | Neil Blackman | |
|
10 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
4 |
|
| Emma Dudley | Ann Scholes | |
| ----- GAME #1 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.055 | 3.032 | ||
|
win probability
44.96% of 0.100 = 0.045 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.045 | +0.006 | +0.051 |
| Losers | -0.045 | +0.004 | -0.041 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zak Golombeck | 3.109 | +0.051 | 3.160 |
| Neil Blackman | 3.000 | +0.051 | 3.051 |
| Emma Dudley | 3.000 | -0.041 | 2.959 |
| Ann Scholes | 3.064 | -0.041 | 3.023 |
| GAME #2 | ||
| Helen Booth | Emma Dudley | |
|
12 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
7 |
|
| Ann Scholes | Paul Warby | |
| ----- GAME #2 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.230 | 3.012 | ||
|
win probability
12.36% of 0.100 = 0.012 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.012 | +0.005 | +0.017 |
| Losers | -0.012 | +0.007 | -0.005 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Booth | 3.500 | +0.017 | 3.517 |
| Emma Dudley | 2.959 | +0.017 | 2.976 |
| Ann Scholes | 3.023 | -0.005 | 3.018 |
| Paul Warby | 3.000 | -0.005 | 2.995 |
| GAME #3 | ||
| Ann Scholes | Neil Blackman | |
|
10 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
7 |
|
| Emma Dudley | Zak Golombeck | |
| ----- GAME #3 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.046 | 3.064 | ||
|
win probability
53.92% of 0.100 = 0.054 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.054 | +0.003 | +0.057 |
| Losers | -0.054 | +0.007 | -0.047 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Scholes | 3.018 | +0.057 | 3.075 |
| Neil Blackman | 3.074 | +0.057 | 3.131 |
| Emma Dudley | 2.976 | -0.047 | 2.929 |
| Zak Golombeck | 3.151 | -0.047 | 3.104 |
| GAME #4 | ||
| Helen Booth | Ann Scholes | |
|
13 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
5 |
|
| Emma Dudley | Paul Warby | |
| ----- GAME #4 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.308 | 2.958 | ||
|
win probability
4.13% of 0.100 = 0.004 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.004 | +0.008 | +0.012 |
| Losers | -0.004 | +0.005 | +0.001 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Booth | 3.540 | +0.012 | 3.552 |
| Ann Scholes | 3.075 | +0.012 | 3.087 |
| Emma Dudley | 2.929 | +0.001 | 2.930 |
| Paul Warby | 2.986 | +0.001 | 2.987 |
| GAME #5 | ||
| Jan Van Der Pijl | Emma Dudley | |
|
10 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
3 |
|
| Ton Van Der Pijl | Ann Scholes | |
| ----- GAME #5 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.272 | 3.339 | ||
|
win probability
64.61% of 0.100 = 0.065 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.065 | +0.007 | +0.072 |
| Losers | -0.065 | +0.003 | -0.062 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Van Der Pijl | 3.613 | +0.072 | 3.685 |
| Emma Dudley | 2.930 | +0.072 | 3.002 |
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.590 | -0.062 | 3.528 |
| Ann Scholes | 3.087 | -0.062 | 3.025 |
| GAME #6 | ||
| Ann Scholes | Rob Tinniswood | |
|
15 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
1 |
|
| Paul Warby | Angela Campbel-Al-Saidi | |
| ----- GAME #6 STATS ----- | |||
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.448 | 3.350 | ||
|
win probability
29.21% of 0.100 = 0.029 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.029 | +0.014 | +0.043 |
| Losers | -0.029 | +0.001 | -0.028 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Scholes | 3.025 | +0.043 | 3.068 |
| Rob Tinniswood | 3.871 | +0.043 | 3.914 |
| Paul Warby | 2.982 | -0.028 | 2.954 |
| Angela Campbel-Al-Saidi | 3.717 | -0.028 | 3.689 |