Game Details For Ton Van Der Pijl
Playdate: 29-05-2026
| GAME #1 | ||
| Ruth Needham | Nigel Scholes | |
|
8 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
|
5 |
|
| Ton Van Der Pijl | Andrea Sofield | |
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.346 | 3.166 | ||
|
Win probability
16.61% of 0.100 = 0.017 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.017 | +0.003 | +0.020 |
| Losers | -0.017 | +0.005 | -0.012 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruth Needham | 3.438 | +0.020 | 3.458 |
| Nigel Scholes | 3.253 | +0.020 | 3.273 |
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.391 | -0.012 | 3.379 |
| Andrea Sofield | 2.941 | -0.012 | 2.929 |
| GAME #2 | ||
| Ton Van Der Pijl | Antonia Wright | |
|
|
16 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
|
0 |
|
| Frances Williams | Nigel Scholes | |
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.234 | 3.160 | ||
|
Win probability
33.96% of 0.100 = 0.034 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.034 | +0.016 | +0.050 |
| Losers | -0.034 | +0.000 | -0.034 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.379 | +0.050 | 3.429 |
| Antonia Wright | 3.088 | +0.050 | 3.138 |
| Frances Williams | 3.046 | -0.034 | 3.012 |
| Nigel Scholes | 3.273 | -0.034 | 3.239 |
| GAME #3 | ||
| Ruth Needham | Ton Van Der Pijl | |
|
|
10 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
|
9 |
|
| Nigel Scholes | Andrea Sofield | |
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.408 | 3.125 | ||
|
Win probability
7.29% of 0.100 = 0.007 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.007 | +0.001 | +0.008 |
| Losers | -0.007 | +0.009 | +0.002 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruth Needham | 3.387 | +0.008 | 3.395 |
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.429 | +0.008 | 3.437 |
| Nigel Scholes | 3.239 | +0.002 | 3.241 |
| Andrea Sofield | 3.011 | +0.002 | 3.013 |
| GAME #4 | ||
| Nigel Scholes | Ann Scholes | |
|
|
10 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
|
3 |
|
| Frances Williams | Ton Van Der Pijl | |
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.306 | 3.201 | ||
|
Win probability
28.11% of 0.100 = 0.028 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.028 | +0.007 | +0.035 |
| Losers | -0.028 | +0.003 | -0.025 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigel Scholes | 3.241 | +0.035 | 3.276 |
| Ann Scholes | 3.370 | +0.035 | 3.405 |
| Frances Williams | 2.965 | -0.025 | 2.940 |
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.437 | -0.025 | 3.412 |
| GAME #5 | ||
| Ton Van Der Pijl | Alison Reardon | |
|
|
8 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
|
5 |
|
| Nigel Scholes | Antonia Wright | |
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.507 | 3.235 | ||
|
Win probability
7.98% of 0.100 = 0.008 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.008 | +0.003 | +0.011 |
| Losers | -0.008 | +0.005 | -0.003 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.412 | +0.011 | 3.423 |
| Alison Reardon | 3.601 | +0.011 | 3.612 |
| Nigel Scholes | 3.276 | -0.003 | 3.273 |
| Antonia Wright | 3.193 | -0.003 | 3.190 |
| GAME #6 | ||
| Nigel Scholes | Graham Driver | |
|
|
18 |
|
| ----------- vs ----------- | ||
|
|
0 |
|
| Stephen Wheeler | Ton Van Der Pijl | |
| Winners Avg 4DR | Losers Avg 4DR | ||
| 3.358 | 3.190 | ||
|
Win probability
18.1% of 0.100 = 0.018 4DR points
|
|||
| 4DR Points | Score Points | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winners | +0.018 | +0.018 | +0.036 |
| Losers | -0.018 | +0.000 | -0.018 |
| Name | 4DR Start | Points +/- | 4DR Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigel Scholes | 3.273 | +0.036 | 3.309 |
| Graham Driver | 3.443 | +0.036 | 3.479 |
| Stephen Wheeler | 2.957 | -0.018 | 2.939 |
| Ton Van Der Pijl | 3.423 | -0.018 | 3.405 |
